Latest News  

How to protect your Romanian company against managerial abuse

About 4 in 100 companies registered in Romania filed for insolvency in 2015. Concurrently, the insolvency rate in Romania is the highest in Eastern Europe, with an increasing number of companies of 1 mil. EUR and above (in revenue) undergoing such procedures, says Horatiu Brisc, Associate, ONV LAW.

2016-01-18 15:52:10 - by Horatiu Brisc

While management errors and abuse are one of the main causes of insolvency, company owners have limited means to mitigate such risks as long as art 55 of Companies' Law (CL no. 31/1990) protects the third parties involved, when administrators breach their mandate, at the expense of company owners. In these circumstances, how can owners protect themselves from the negligence and abuse of administrators?

Art 70 of CL states that administrators are entitled to perform all necessary operations for meeting the company's statement of objects (i.e. the NACE codes). However, this mandate is limited to what is set forth within the articles of incorporation (AOI). Therefore, administrators are bound both by a contractual mandate (see art. 70) as well as by the legal provisions regulating companies' interests for public order purposes, according to art. 72 of CL.

Art 55 of CL takes a different stance on the actual extent to which a company is engaged by its administrator if he/she exceeds his/her mandate. Based on art 55 the company is liable for the administrators' actions in relation to third parties acting in good faith. This stands even if the administrator's powers have been restricted within the AOI and even if these restrictions have been made public with the Romanian Trade Register. What is the reasoning behind this? The authorities explain that it would be excessive and inappropriate for the third party involved to verify the administrator's mandate every time they do business together.

Legally speaking, art 55 transposes the provisions of art 10 of Directive 2009/101/EC. The rationale behind the European provisions is to primarily protect third parties. Thus, the regulation aims at limiting as much as possible the circumstances where the actions performed on behalf of the company are not valid. This is why mandate restrictions for administrators set by company owners to mitigate their own risks are overruled by art 55.

Various rulings on this matter show that the rationale behind art 55 prevailed in court. For instance, in the case of a limited liability company (SRL) where the two administrators were managing based on dual signature, the court ruled that the company was still liable for the administrator's actions in relation to third parties, even if in this particular case only one administrator signed off the papers. That was because the liability for breaching mandate restrictions set by company owners is of secondary importance: what comes first is protecting the interests of the third party involved, provided that the latter acted in good faith. Another ruling had a similar outcome.

When the owners of a company capped the value of the contracts that the administrator could sign (through an addendum to the AOI), the court ruled that the publishing of the addendum does not imply that the third party is automatically informed of it . Therefore, even if the restrictions upon the administrator's mandate have been made public, they do not safeguard owners' interests.
What can the company owners do then?

One of the few ways in which company owners can protect themselves against the negligence and abuse of administrators is to have the administrator introduce a clause in any contract that he/she signs off, stating the limitations of his/her mandate. This should prove that the third party was properly informed of the extent of the administrator's mandate. However it is unlikely that such clauses will be introduced in all agreements concluded by an administrator acting in bad faith.

Another solution would be for the company to purchase a Directors & Officers (D&O) insurance policy. Such policies cover the liability of company managers who wish to be protected from claims which may arise from the decisions and actions taken within the scope of their regular duties. Should a company go bankrupt, D&O may often be one of its few assets, providing the shareholders have a way to recover a part of the loss. However, a D&O policies do not cover fraudulent, criminal or intentional non-compliant acts.


1 COMMENTS ^ Go back to Top

Nikolas Rufus: on 2016-01-26 21:10:22
Great Article. Where can I contact you ?
WRITE A COMMENT ^ Go back to Top
 
Your email address will not be published.
Nickname
Email
Comment
Validation Code
   
 
 
NEWS
The most appreciated companies from the outsourcing industry, awarded at ABSL Gala 2018 Romania

The most appreciated companies in the outsourcing industry were awarded last night, at the ABSL Romania Awards Gala, a recent announcement of the company stated.

 Read Full article »
Cybersecurity Tech Accord: 34 leading companies sign pledge to fight cyberattacks to promise equal protection for customers worldwide

Companies across every layer of internet communication vow to defend against misuse of their technology; promise to protect all customers regardless of nationality, geography or attack motivation.

 Read Full article »
Accenture study finds 87 percent of focused cyberattacks are prevented

With ransomware and distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks on the rise, the average number of focused cyberattacks per organization has more than doubled this year compared to the previous 12 months (232

 Read Full article »
Romanian software group expands to Bulgaria

Romanian group Global Technical Systems, which specializes in software development and providing technological solutions for building efficiency and security infrastructures, aims to double its turnover this ye

 Read Full article »
Vodafone Survey: Romanian youngsters would rather work for themselves, than for a company

Romania ranks first in terms of percentage of youngsters who would rather work for themselves/be an entrepreneur than for a company, with 51 percent expressing this preference, according to Vodafone survey.

 Read Full article »
Bucharest office market: Over 30 per cent of the demand came from the companies that moved from old buildings in modern projects

Companies have rented in the first quarter almost 70,000 square meters of office space in Bucharest, one third of the demand came from companies that formerly had its headquarters in old, small buildings or in

 Read Full article »
ABSL Romania: The Business Services sector has thousands of jobs available for young professionals

The Association of Business Service Leaders in Romania (ABSL) announces thousands of positions available for young professionals with little to entry-level experience in the business services sector. Accounting

 Read Full article »
Zitec rents 1,700 sqm at Vastint's Timpuri Noi Square

Vastint Romania has leased 1,700 sqm of office space to Zitec, in the mixed-use development project at Timpuri Noi Square in Bucharest, the developer recently announced.

 Read Full article »
Ness Digital Engineering reached 100 employees in Timişoara and 2,800 sqm in the UBC 2 building in the Openville mixed-use project

In March, Ness Digital Engineering reached a 2,800 sqm area in the United Business Center 2 (UBC 2) building located in the Openville Timişoara development, after taking over a new floor of the office building

 Read Full article »
Timpuri Noi Square awarded the highest LEED certification

Vastint Romania was awarded LEED Platinum certification for the first two office buildings of Timpuri Noi Square.

 Read Full article »
 
 
MOST READ ARTICLES
» BPO: the ideal breeding ground for BPI
» Romanian software group expands to Bul...
» Deloitte opens European Regional Deliv...
» Large office space leases dominate the...
» Bitdefender: Half of Romanian fear tha...
» What do digital, automation and outsou...
» CBRE: Bucharest will witness a fivefol...
» CBRE: Bucharest and Budapest should be...
» Oracle study: Less than half of employ...
» Class IT becomes Startech Team and exp...
 
EDITOR CHOICE
The voting for The Brand of the Year 2018 in Outsourcing and Shared Services is now open!

Outsourcing Today presents the fourth edition of the annual Romanian Outsourcing & Shared Services Awards, the event that recognizes, rewards and celebrates the success of the most prominent companies acting in

 Read Full article »
Romanian Outsourcing & Shared Services Summit: The very definition of millennials is change

Adapting to future workforce trends whilst balancing intelligent automation, digitalization, and millennial teams was one of the most discussed topic of the second session of the Fourth Edition of Romanian Outs

 Read Full article »
Stefanini invests in AI and reinforces Sophie's capabilities

Recently, Stefanini announced it is reinforcing its investments in Sophie, an artificial intelligence platform with the ability to turn data into valuable solutions. Fully developed within Stefanini's research

 Read Full article »
Romanian Outsourcing & Shared Services Summit: Diversity is value

The second session of the recently ended Romanian Outsourcing & Shared Services Summit highlighted topics on the future workforce trends such as digital transformation, automation, the repositioning of the impo

 Read Full article »
ROMANIAN OUTSOURCING & SHARED SERVICES SUMMIT, with Irina Sersun-Gürtler, Noerr: Bringing the employees on board

This March, the professionals, leaders and key voices in the outsourcing and business shared services industries joined for three rounds of lively knowledge exchange within the Fourth Edition of Romanian Outsou

 Read Full article »
Latest News  
 
about us | newsletter | contact | members area
Copyright © 2015 by Diplomat Media Events Design by Diplomat Media Events